Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0401220816290.24807-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bunch o' dead code in GEQO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> The GEQO planner module contains six different recombination algorithms,
> only one of which is actually used --- the others are ifdef'd out, and
> have been ever since we got the code.  Does anyone see a reason not to
> prune the deadwood?

considering the recent discussion about REALLY slow query planning by the 
GEQO module, it might be worth testing each one to see which works best 
before lopping them off.

But I don't do anything that needs GEQO, so for me, it doesn't really 
matter.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: cache control?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cache control?