Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0311060806210.12004-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases  (Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>)
Responses Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
List pgsql-admin
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Jeff wrote:

> On 06 Nov 2003 15:21:03 +0100
> Marek Florianczyk <franki@tpi.pl> wrote:
>
>
> > fsync = false
>
> HOLD THE BOAT THERE BATMAN!
>
> I would *STRONGLY* advise not running with fsync=false in production as
> PG _CANNOT_ guaruntee data consistancy in the event of a hardware
> failure.  It would sure suck to have a power failure screw up your nice
> db for the users!

Note that if you're on an IDE drive and you haven't disabled the write
cache, you may as well turn off fsync as well, as it's just getting in the
way and doing nothing, i.e. the IDE drives are already lying about fsync
so why bother.

Step the first, get on SCSI / or a good IDE RAID controller, then step the
second, turn fsync back on.  Without reliable storage, fsync is a dunsel.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: data format problem for upgrede from 7.1->7.3