Re: Constraint Problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: Constraint Problem
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0311031259420.7465-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Constraint Problem  (Ron St-Pierre <rstpierre@syscor.com>)
Responses Re: Constraint Problem
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Ron St-Pierre wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Ron St-Pierre <rstpierre@syscor.com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I just want to constrain the ysnDefault field to only allow one TRUE
> >>value for any companyID/associationID pair, with no restrictions on the
> >>number of FALSES.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >You could do that with a partial unique index.  There is an example
> >at the bottom of
> >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/indexes-partial.html
> >
> >            regards, tom lane
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> >               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> This is not quite what I need. I need to create a constraint to allow
> only -one- of
>     company<->association<->default(=true) value
> but any number of
>     company<->association<->default(=false) values
>
> I've tried many different ALTER TABLE ... CREATE CONSTRAINT variations,
> all without success.

Wouldn't a unique constraint on those three fields do this?  Nulls don't
violate unique constraints.  Does that work, or did I miss too much of
this conversation?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martin Hart
Date:
Subject: C functions quicker than Plpgsql?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Constraint Problem