Re: postgres 6.2 vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: postgres 6.2 vacuum
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0309231053050.12142-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgres 6.2 vacuum  (Hornyak Laszlo <kocka@tigrasoft.hu>)
Responses Re: postgres 6.2 vacuum  (Hornyak Laszlo <kocka@tigrasoft.hu>)
List pgsql-admin
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Hornyak Laszlo wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> We have a database on postgreSQL 6.2 and it is extremely slow, so we
> started vacuum on it. I know it locks the tables, so clients can not use
> it until the process is finished, but it is extremely slow on a 1.800.000
> record table and we don't know how to make it faster. Can anybody help me?
>
> It seems it is writing an index file, but it grows very slowly.
>
> I know we should use 7.3 at least, we are working on it, but we need to
> survive this day with 6.2 :(

In all honesty, it'd probably be faster to convert than to wait for that
vacuum to finish.

seriously.

6.2 is like the model A of Postgresql versions.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: steps to ensure referential integrity
Next
From: "Priya G"
Date:
Subject: Re: help needed!!!