Re: Buglist - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Roderick A. Anderson
Subject Re: Buglist
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0308190523480.28162-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Buglist  (Bo Lorentsen <bl@netgroup.dk>)
Responses Re: Buglist  (Bo Lorentsen <bl@netgroup.dk>)
Re: Buglist  (David Siebert <dsiebert@eclipsecat.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 19 Aug 2003, Bo Lorentsen wrote:

> Also have anyone tryed to compare the new transaction model in MySQL 4.x
> to PostgreSQL ?

Bo,  I've recently started having to deal with MySQL. (Web sites
wanting/using php _need/have-to-have_ MySQL. Their words not mine.)  And
from going from a "I dislike MySQL" to "I'm really hating MySQL" has been
getting easier and easier.
   My dealings with MySQL are for the 3.xx version but I semi-followed a
thread on this several months ago so feel fully qualified to to throw in
my views.  :-)  My take on others research was that MySQL transaction
model is a bubble gum and bailing wire add on not an integral part of
MySQL.  It _was_ tacked onto the top of the database so if either it or
MySQL failed you were likely to loose data.

> I'm looking forward to recive even more constructive arguements :-)

How about "Friends don't let friends use MySQL"?

Hopefully others with a stonger knowledge will provide this.


Rod
--
  "Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bo Lorentsen
Date:
Subject: Buglist
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Buglist