Re: Server side resultset search (for performance reasons) - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: Server side resultset search (for performance reasons)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0308041013430.10401-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Server side resultset search (for performance reasons)  ("David Wall" <d.wall@computer.org>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, David Wall wrote:

> > I'm surprised no one has yet suggested using a cursor.
>
> Some people don't use cursors because creating and using them requires
> db-specific code inside their otherwise vanilla JDBC.  Of course, using
> LIMIT/OFFSET is also db-specific...

Actually, cursors are sql spec, i.e. any SQL92 database that supports
transactions likely supports cursors, at least static ones.

limit/offset, like you mention, are not spec in sql 92.  They looked like
they might have been considered, as they are in the older versions listed
as reserved keywords though.


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "David Wall"
Date:
Subject: Re: Server side resultset search (for performance reasons)
Next
From: Felipe Schnack
Date:
Subject: Re: setFetchSize() bug?