Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0210111513090.1778-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.  (Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers@empires.org>)
Responses Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.  (Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers@empires.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jeff Davis wrote:

> > They also state that they have more sophisticated ALTER TABLE...
> >
> > Only usable feature in their ALTER TABLE that doesn't (yet) exist in
> > PostgreSQL was changing column order (ok, the order by in table creation
> > could be nice), and that's still almost purely cosmetic. Anyway, I could
> > have used that command yesterday. Could this be added to pgsql.
> >
> 
> I agree with your message except for that statement. MySQL alter table 
> provides the ability to change column types and cast the records 
> automatically. I remember that feature as really the only thing from MySQL 
> that I've ever missed. 
> 
> Of course, it's not that wonderful in theory. During development you can 
> easily drop/recreate the tables and reload the test data; during production 
> you don't change the data types of your attributes.
> 
> But in practice, during development it's handy sometimes. 

I still remember a post from somebody on the phpbuilder site that had 
changed a field from varchar to date and all the dates he had got changed 
to 0000-00-00.

He most unimpressed, especially since he (being typical of a lot of MySQL 
users) didn't have a backup.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: snpe
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Out of memory error on huge resultset
Next
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.