Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mike Mascari
Subject Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Date
Msg-id 3DA752F4.3060904@mascari.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jeff Davis wrote:
> 
>>I agree with your message except for that statement. MySQL alter table 
>>provides the ability to change column types and cast the records 
>>automatically. I remember that feature as really the only thing from MySQL 
>>that I've ever missed. 
>>
>>Of course, it's not that wonderful in theory. During development you can 
>>easily drop/recreate the tables and reload the test data; during production 
>>you don't change the data types of your attributes.
>>
>>But in practice, during development it's handy sometimes. 
> 
> 
> I still remember a post from somebody on the phpbuilder site that had 
> changed a field from varchar to date and all the dates he had got changed 
> to 0000-00-00.
> 
> He most unimpressed, especially since he (being typical of a lot of MySQL 
> users) didn't have a backup.

Couldn't he just do ROLLBACK? ;-)

(for the humor impaired, that's a joke...)

Mike Mascari
mascarm@mascari.com





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Next
From: Giles Lean
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/fixchar (Was: Large databases, performance)