Re: uncommited question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: uncommited question
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0208091449110.26480-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: uncommited question  (Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob@zoism.org>)
Responses Re: uncommited question  ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
On 10 Aug 2002, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:

> On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 05:03, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
> >
> > Hopefully that explains the difference well enough.
>
> Yeah, I thought postgresql had by default the auto-commit thing?  Is it
> a config setup somewhere?

Postgresql is in autocommit mode until you initiate a transaction with a
begin statement.

I.e. when you enter the psql monitor, and type in:

update table set field1='something' where id=45;

Postgresql internally wraps the update in the equivalent of a begin;end;
pair.

There was some talk of making psql run in a kind of auto-transact mode,
where it would throw a begin; when you started it up, and another when you
did a commit or rollback.  I haven't seen any work done on it though.  I
kinda prefer the way postgresql does it, but can understand the
advantages to the way Oracle et. al. do it.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: oid's and primary keys on insert
Next
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: oid's and primary keys on insert