Re: Serious performance problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tille, Andreas
Subject Re: Serious performance problem
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0110301342320.6117-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serious performance problem  ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:

> You could somewhat speed up the query if you avoid that the sort
> hits the disk. A simple test here showed, that you need somewhere
> near sort_mem = 15000 in postgresql.conf.
Well this are the usual hints from pgsql-general.  I did so and
increased step by step to:
  shared_buffers = 131072  sort_mem       = 65536

This lead to a double of speed in my tests but this are settings where
an enhancement of memory doesn´t result in a speed increase any more.

When I was posting my question here I was talking about this "tuned"
PostgreSQL server.  The default settings where even worse!

Kind regards
       Andreas.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brent Verner
Date:
Subject: Re: Serious performance problem
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-committers?