Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alex Knight
Subject Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0106271343490.18309-100000@blowfish.phunc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Responses Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL  ("Tim Mickol" <tmickol@combimatrix.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:

> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:15, Alex Knight wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > Disagreed over here, with 4+ years of experience 24x7 on RHL since RHL
> > > 4.1.
>
> > This 4+ years 24/7 experience isn't on that server you said was for
> > internal purposes with low load you mentioned in a previous post, is it?
>
> No.  This one has been streaming our RealAudio stream 24x7 since May 1, 1997
> (minus a few hours for maintenance -- you know, things like replacing failed
> power supplies, replacing/installing hard drives, upgradingthe OS, etc.
> Still running the same Super Micro dual PPro 200 motherboard -- but 192MB now
> instead of the 64MB we started with.  ECC, of course. Will be replacing with
> the 'lightly loaded' PIII-600 w/ 1GB as soon as Real Networks supports kernel
> 2.4.) -- along with mail, DNS, and seven domains worth of webservice.  Not
> terribly heavy loaded -- but we can and do saturate our T1.

Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
just doesn't cut it.

I have a T1 to my house, and I saturate it all the time... without load :)

-Knight


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alex Knight
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL