Re: elog() proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: elog() proposal
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0202241156150.686-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: elog() proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: elog() proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.
>
> Proposals then?  What's been used or bandied about so far are
> "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it).
> "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague;
>        it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL).
> "FATALALL" (also yuck).

I think FATALALL is good, because it tells you exactly what is going on,
namely the same as FATAL but for all sessions.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karl DeBisschop
Date:
Subject: Re: Duration of beta period
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: elog() proposal