Re: CallableStatements - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Stuart Robinson |
---|---|
Subject | Re: CallableStatements |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111260946320.21597-100000@dreamingamerica.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: CallableStatements (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>) |
Responses |
Re: CallableStatements
|
List | pgsql-jdbc |
But what do you do if you want to call a stored procedure and NOT get a result? On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Barry Lind wrote: > As Dave has said, since stored procedures in Postgres can only return a > single value, there is little to be gained from CallableStatements that > you can't already do with regular Statements or PreparedStatements. > > The way to call stored procedures in postgres is via a select statement. > Thus to call procedure foo(), you would issue the query 'select > foo()'. Since this is a standard select statement, you can use either a > regular Statement or PreparedStatement to get the result of this stored > procedure. > > Having said that, if you wanted to contribute a CallableStatement > implementation for postgres we would be glad to accept it. Remember > that this is an open source project, features get added by people who > want or need them. If you need CallableStatements implement them an > submit a patch. > > thanks, > --Barry > > > > Dave Cramer wrote: > > > Well, given that postgres doesn't support the notion of returning a > > result set from a stored procedure; I'm not sure what benefit this would > > be. > > > > Regards, > > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > > email@gregorybittar.com > > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 6:47 PM > > To: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org > > Subject: [JDBC] CallableStatements > > > > > > CallableStatements weren't in Postgres as of the last time I checked, > > version 7.1. > > > > The JDBC specification has lots of goodies in it, such as examining a > > server's metadata and sending cursors backwards and forwards over result > > sets. However, from the perspective of a Java programmer, > > CallableStatements are essential tools for communicating with a database > > server. > > > > Without the benefit of CallableStatements, all efforts at efficiency are > > wasted. The hallmark of any robust system is distributed processing, > > which requires invoking stored procedures on foreign machines. Doing so > > through CallableStatements would > > (a) accomplish work and (b) retrieve a result code in one logical > > network transmission. Without CallableStatements, retrieving the result > > code not only requires more programming infrastructure, but also taxes > > the application at runtime as the Java application tries to discover > > what the result of the stored procedure was. This method requires an > > additional deletion to purge the logged result code record, lest the log > > grow, slowing searches. Therefore, we are looking at considerably more > > processing done, 2 or 3 transmissions, where 1 should suffice. > > > > Consequently, I would hope that CallableStatements are recognized as a > > very important part of the JDBC puzzle. > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Stuart Robinson [stuart@zapata.org]
pgsql-jdbc by date: