Re: CallableStatements - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Stuart Robinson
Subject Re: CallableStatements
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0111260946320.21597-100000@dreamingamerica.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CallableStatements  (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>)
Responses Re: CallableStatements  ("Dave Cramer" <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
But what do you do if you want to call a stored procedure and NOT get a
result?

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Barry Lind wrote:

> As Dave has said, since stored procedures in Postgres can only return a
> single value, there is little to be gained from CallableStatements that
> you can't already do with regular Statements or PreparedStatements.
>
> The way to call stored procedures in postgres is via a select statement.
>   Thus to call procedure foo(), you would issue the query 'select
> foo()'.  Since this is a standard select statement, you can use either a
> regular Statement or PreparedStatement to get the result of this stored
> procedure.
>
> Having said that, if you wanted to contribute a CallableStatement
> implementation for postgres we would be glad to accept it.  Remember
> that this is an open source project, features get added by people who
> want or need them.  If you need CallableStatements implement them an
> submit a patch.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
>
>
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Well, given that postgres doesn't support the notion of returning a
> > result set from a stored procedure; I'm not sure what benefit this would
> > be.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> > email@gregorybittar.com
> > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 6:47 PM
> > To: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
> > Subject: [JDBC] CallableStatements
> >
> >
> > CallableStatements weren't in Postgres as of the last time I checked,
> > version 7.1.
> >
> > The JDBC specification has lots of goodies in it, such as examining a
> > server's metadata and sending cursors backwards and forwards over result
> > sets.  However, from the perspective of a Java programmer,
> > CallableStatements are essential tools for communicating with a database
> > server.
> >
> > Without the benefit of CallableStatements, all efforts at efficiency are
> > wasted.  The hallmark of any robust system is distributed processing,
> > which requires invoking stored procedures on foreign machines.  Doing so
> > through CallableStatements would
> > (a) accomplish work and (b) retrieve a result code in one logical
> > network transmission.  Without CallableStatements, retrieving the result
> > code not only requires more programming infrastructure, but also taxes
> > the application at runtime as the Java application tries to discover
> > what the result of the stored procedure was. This method requires an
> > additional deletion to purge the logged result code record, lest the log
> > grow, slowing searches. Therefore, we are looking at considerably more
> > processing done, 2 or 3 transmissions, where 1 should suffice.
> >
> > Consequently, I would hope that CallableStatements are recognized as a
> > very important part of the JDBC puzzle.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> >     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

--
Stuart Robinson  [stuart@zapata.org]


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Nate Gelbard
Date:
Subject: JDBC bug?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC bug?