Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0111151643480.633-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> BTW, is there any good reason that AS is not a member of the ColLabel
> set?  It wouldn't cause a parse conflict to add it (I just tested that)
> and it seems like that's a special case we could do without.

Fine with me.  I guess I'll wait with the new table a bit yet. ;-)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Open items
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Use of 'now'