Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id 22765.1005883944@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Fine with me.  I guess I'll wait with the new table a bit yet. ;-)

The coast is clear now ...

I divided the keywords into four mutually exclusive, all inclusive
category lists:unreserved_keywordcol_name_keywordfunc_name_keywordreserved_keyword
which I trust will not be a problem for your document-generating
script.

ecpg has some finer distinctions but I'm happy to leave those
undocumented.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bill Studenmund
Date:
Subject: Re: Open items
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)