Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id 6923.1005756217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
List pgsql-hackers
BTW, is there any good reason that AS is not a member of the ColLabel
set?  It wouldn't cause a parse conflict to add it (I just tested that)
and it seems like that's a special case we could do without.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open items
Next
From: Giuseppe Tanzilli - CSF
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2b2 problem using like 'XXX%' sequential scan