Re: RE: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: RE: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0107011315010.1674-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])  ("Dave Cramer" <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer writes:

> The getXXXFunctions aren't implemented
> Some of the other functions are correct for version 7.1 but not for
> previous versions. Ie. The row length, etc. I think the driver should
> get the version and determine what is correct for each version.

Indeed.  Btw., why are there different DatabaseMetaData classes for jdbc1
and jdbc2?  The jdbc2 extensions shouldn't hurt when present in jdbc1, and
this way we'd have a better chance of keeping jdbc1 alive (if we cared to
do so).

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] New code for JDBC driver
Next
From: elwood@agouros.de (Konstantinos Agouros)
Date:
Subject: How to pack postgresql.jar for an applet