Re: Lisp as procedural language - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0105052337350.769-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Lisp as procedural language  ("Vladimir V. Zolotych" <gsmith@eurocom.od.ua>)
Responses Re: Lisp as procedural language  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Vladimir V. Zolotych writes:

> I see the following
>
> proba=> select * from pg_language;
> lanname |lanispl|lanpltrusted|lanplcallfoid|lancompiler
> --------+-------+------------+-------------+--------------
> internal|f      |f           |            0|n/a
> lisp    |f      |f           |            0|/usr/ucb/liszt
[...]

This must have been an artifact from the time when part of the Postgres
system was written in Lisp.  A Lisp procedural language never actually
existed in PostgreSQL.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: elog(LOG), elog(DEBUG)
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: File system performance and pg_xlog