Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141808310.1112-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is
> > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it?
>
> I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and
> I'll object to any attempt to remove the option.

The description should be updated though:
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL

I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync
performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do
if I turn off fsync anyway."

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.1 items
Next
From: Fred Yankowski
Date:
Subject: possible to create CVS branch for proposed patch?