Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Hornyak Laszlo |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0309250818410.1830-100000@tiger.tigrasoft.hu Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum
Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum |
List | pgsql-hackers |
I think it is not that simple. How should I explain the company leaders why I must stop the system. It may risk their bussiness success too. I can tell them that the new db is more stable, but until the old one does the job, it is still acceptable for them (it served the system for 5-6 years or so). Once it crashes, it is a good reason to do the move. Laszlo On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I wonder if we should have an auto-responder so when someone says they > are running 6.5, we can reply --- Yikes, upgrade. > > In fact, we could go with a little chart: > > 7.3.4 great > 7.3.0-3 please upgrade, it is easy > 7.2 consider upgrading > 7.1 wow, that is old > 7.0 you need an upgrade, pal > <=6.5 run, don't walk, to the nearest PostgreSQL ftp server > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hornyak Laszlo wrote: > > > > Yes, at the end we did the port at night, and in the morning the system > > started without any problem. Some of the dumps from pg 6.2 was not realy > > acceptable by 7.3, but it was easy to fix. > > > > Thank you for your help! > > > > Laszlo Hornyak > > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Hornyak Laszlo wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > We have a database on postgreSQL 6.2 and it is extremely slow, so we > > > > started vacuum on it. I know it locks the tables, so clients can not use > > > > it until the process is finished, but it is extremely slow on a 1.800.000 > > > > record table and we don't know how to make it faster. Can anybody help me? > > > > > > > > It seems it is writing an index file, but it grows very slowly. > > > > > > > > I know we should use 7.3 at least, we are working on it, but we need to > > > > survive this day with 6.2 :( > > > > > > In all honesty, it'd probably be faster to convert than to wait for that > > > vacuum to finish. > > > > > > seriously. > > > > > > 6.2 is like the model A of Postgresql versions. > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 >
pgsql-hackers by date: