On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes:
> > Can it be that I'm the only one to have hit this problem that dropped
> > columns are still included in rowtypes?
>
> No, you're not. This is a known deficiency. AFAIR no one has come up
> with a workable solution yet.
Hmmmm...I don't remember seeing any messages about that. Sorry for the noise
[again].
I haven't looked at the code so I presume from that comment it's not as simple
as I thought it might be, i.e. there isn't a loop somewhere constructing a
tupleDesc where the isdropped flag can ge tested.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
