Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0302121616330.30946-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL Tuning Results  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results
List pgsql-advocacy
Hi Chris,

On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Machine:
> 256MB RAM, FreeBSD 4.7, EIDE HDD, > 1 Ghz

Seems like a small amount of memory to be memory based tests with.

What about testing sort_mem as well. It would system to me that there
would be no negative to having infinite sort_mem given infinite memory,
though.

Gavin


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: