> > I am now going to leave it on 5000 and play with wal_buffers.
> > Is there anything else people are interested in me trying?
>
> Keenly interested. Who wouldn't want to know how to optimize it?
> That's the hardest guideline to find.
Oops - what that sentence was supposed to say is "Is there anyone else
interested in me trying any other variables?"
What I don't really know is what is actually affected by wal_buffers? I
assume my select only tests won't even touch the WAL, so I guess I have to
just play with tpc-b.
Chris
