On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > > > perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> > A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.
>
> Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
When was it discussed so that I can have a read? I cannot recall it.
And yes, it is not pleasant to implement. Luckily, the design of the
CREATE DATABASE rule had already incorporated the possibility of
...
WITH LOCATION = ...
WITH TEMPLAETE = ...
etc.
I'm not sure, however, if this is really what you were asking.
Gavin
