Tom Lane writes:
> > dep depend:
> > $(CC) -MM $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
>
> Why? Shouldn't CFLAGS include CPPFLAGS?
Nope. That's what it does now, but the implicit rule is
%.o: %.c$(CC) -c $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
so if you set CFLAGS to include CPPFLAGS then you get all of it
double. So I have to fix all the rules to say
dep depend:$(CC) -MM $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
I just notice that the workaround I had in mind won't work so well, so I
guess I'll have to fix it the hard way.
> These targets seem correct to me as they stand ... other than assuming
> CC is gcc, but nevermind that...
I'd be glad to add support for other compilers into the --enable-depend
mechanism, if someone supplies the details.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
