RE: view performance - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Mario Amado Alves
Subject RE: view performance
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.10.10006151601560.18157-100000@lexis.di.fct.unl.pt
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: view performance  (Michael Ansley <Michael.Ansley@intecsystems.co.uk>)
List pgsql-admin
> If your tables are indexed on date, among other things, the performance
> should be as good as it is now.

Nop. My experience with Postgres views has shown that the views must
themselves be indexed.

>
> >>   -----Original Message-----
> >>   From: Lo�c TREGOU�T [mailto:loic@ext.cri74.org]
> >>   Sent: 14 June 2000 13:26
> >>   To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> >>   Subject: [ADMIN] view performance
> >>
> >>
> >>   Hello ,
> >>
> >>       I use a database to store log files . I have 2 Million
> >>   rows by year
> >>   .
> >>   I want the maximum of performance when i access them from
> >>   my web site so
> >>   i've started to make one table by year :
> >>   log2000 : contain all the log information of the year 2000
> >>   log 1999 : ..
> >>
> >>   I think now it's a bad idea because when i want to select
> >>   on two table i
> >>   have :
> >>   column x is ambiguous !
> >>
> >>   But if i use only one table , it will be a huge table i will lose
> >>   performance . Isn't it ?
> >>
> >>   If i use view , i will not increase the performance
> >>   because it's just a
> >>   view and not a table properly . Isn't it ?
> >>
> >>               Please help me   , thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>   loic@ext.cri74.org
> >>
>

| |,| | | |RuaFranciscoTaborda24RcD 2815-249CharnecaCaparica 351+939354002
|M|A|R|I|O|
|A|M|A|D|O|DepartmentoDeInformaticaFCT/UNL 2825-114 Caparica 351+212958536
|A|L|V|E|S|                                                  fax 212948541
| | | | | |                 maa@di.fct.unl.pt                FCT 212948300


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Money Data type
Next
From: "dialFree administration"
Date:
Subject: Web based Administration?