Re: [GENERAL] Re: Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter T Mount
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: Large Objects
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.981121123102.5727J-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Re: Large Objects  (Jeroen Schaap <jeroen@rulffh.medfac.leidenuniv.nl>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, Jeroen Schaap wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, James Oden wrote:
>
> > |1) What exactly do you mean with 'view'?
> > | A large object is referenced by its OID (objectID). You just can dump
> > |the object to a file and view the file.
> > I read somewhere (a while back) that postgres internally stores large
> > objects as single files on the filesystem.  Is this still the case?  If it
> > is is there anywork being done to change this?
>
> Yes, it still is a seperate file... seems to be a straightforward
> approach. What's wrong with that?

Unless it's changed in the last few days, they are stored as two files, a
table xinv???? & an index xinx???? (where ???? is the oid of the object).
There was talk of having an alternative system of storing large objects,
as the current scheme is not that efficient in terms of disk space used.

--
       Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk
      Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
 Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Monetary, Float Types
Next
From: "Hui Chun Kit, Jacky"
Date:
Subject: questions on multi-byte characters under postgresql 6.4