On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, Frank Morton wrote:
> Solaris 2.5.1. I am maxing out on something. If I limit the
> activity things work fine. Even if I run the same number
> of events spread over a longer period of time.
I don't think you are.
Thinking about it, the only limit you may reach is the memory size of the
JVM, which by default is 16Mb. I don't think that is it as you are getting
IOExceptions, and not something like OutOfMemoryError...
> I am using Sun's JDK 1.2 beta3.
I haven't tried it under 1.2 yet...
> I plan to test the same application on linux later today
> if possible to see how it does.
It would be interesting to see if you can replicate the problem. If not,
then the only thing I can think is that you are hitting a bug in 1.2
> I'll listen to any advice.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
> To: Frank Morton <fmorton@mail.base2inc.com>
> Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
> Date: Friday, August 28, 1998 12:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC Limit?
>
>
> >On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Frank Morton wrote:
> >
> >> I am using the current release and when using JDBC I frequently
> >> get a java.io.IOException: Broken pipe under heavy load conditions.
> >> Is there a limit anywhere on the number of concurrent connections
> >> to a single database or table within a database? Or any other limit
> >> that could stop connections from opening or being forced to close?
> >
> >There shouldn't be any limit on the number of connections.
> >
> >What platform are you running the VM on?
> >
> >--
> > Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk
> > Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
> >PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
> > Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
>
>
--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
