Re: Proposal for async support in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Vicherek
Subject Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.980421005858.3665U-100000@ann.ied.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > You supply the indication to the backend, and I will see that the
> > backend processes it properly.
>
> You're on ;-)
>
> Signaling the cancel request via OOB sounds reasonable, as long as
> nothing else is using it and all the systems we care about support it.

   SSH doesn't have OOB. You can't send an OOB via SSH encrypted channel.

            Jan

 -- Gospel of Jesus is the saving power of God for all who believe --
Jan Vicherek ## To some, nothing is impossible. ##  www.ied.com/~honza
    >>>    Free Software Union President  ...  www.fslu.org    <<<
Interactive Electronic Design Inc.    -#-    PGP: finger honza@ied.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Configuration problems in PostgreSQL 6.3.2 on Linux-ELF
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] shift/reduce problem with ecpg