Re: Proposal for async support in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
Date
Msg-id 199804211634.MAA14247@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for async support in libpq  (Jan Vicherek <honza@ied.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
List pgsql-hackers
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > You supply the indication to the backend, and I will see that the
> > > backend processes it properly.
> >
> > You're on ;-)
> >
> > Signaling the cancel request via OOB sounds reasonable, as long as
> > nothing else is using it and all the systems we care about support it.
>
>    SSH doesn't have OOB. You can't send an OOB via SSH encrypted channel.

I have trouble buying that.  SSH is just the socket filter.  Perhaps the
OOB data is not encrypted like the normal data?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] drop table inside transactions
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] FAQ organization