Re: [HACKERS] grant broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter T Mount
Subject Re: [HACKERS] grant broken
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.95.980111113947.7629A-100000@maidast
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] grant broken  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> If I understood the test case you published, you are specifying to the grant
> command the database "test", not a table within the database. The man page for
> grant is not very specific, but is this supposed to work?

No, there is a table called test, that I'm granting permissions to. The
database is also called test.

Could grant be confusing the two?

--
Peter T Mount  petermount@earthling.net or pmount@maidast.demon.co.uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 patches
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 patches