Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0808021554140.12209@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Sounds like the thing to do would be to pass CheckpointStats into the
> DONE probe.

I thought it would be more useful to demarcate where the two phases of the 
checkpoint process were at clearly--the actual times themselves are 
helpful but dtrace can do more than that.  The write and sync phases have 
very different I/O characteristics, and it really should be easy for 
people to analyze them independantly.  I'm not familiar enough with dtrace 
to know if that's easy with the patch as it stands, I think there needs to 
be another probe in the middle there to make that straightforward.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hans-Jürgen Schönig"
Date:
Subject: Re: Mini improvement: statement_cost_limit
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies