Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0808011511260.29036@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
One tiny change I'd suggest here:  if you look at the code for checkpoint 
buffer writing there are traces for two points in the process:
 CheckPointBuffers(int flags) {
+       TRACE_POSTGRESQL_BUFFER_CHECKPOINT_START(flags);        CheckpointStats.ckpt_write_t = GetCurrentTimestamp();
    BufferSync(flags);        CheckpointStats.ckpt_sync_t = GetCurrentTimestamp();        smgrsync();
CheckpointStats.ckpt_sync_end_t= GetCurrentTimestamp();
 
+       TRACE_POSTGRESQL_BUFFER_CHECKPOINT_DONE(); }

Note how the existing code also tracks how long the sync phase took 
compared to the write one, and reports both numbers in the checkpoint 
logs.  It would be nice to add another probe at that same point (just 
after ckpt_sync_t is set) so that dtrace users could instrument all these 
possibilities as well:  just buffer write time/resources, just sync ones, 
or both.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: SSL configure patch: review
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SSL configure patch: review