Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0709290043580.8474@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> Also, I spent a dreary two or three hours this afternoon examining the 
> CVS commit logs since 8.3 branched...I tried to post that info to 
> pgsql-docs but it broke the list's message size limits (even gzipped, 
> it's about 90K).

I just dumped a copy of Tom's file on my personal page and posted a much 
slimmed down version that's missing the names of the files touched onto 
the wiki at http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/8.3_Changelog (with 
a pointer to the full text in case anyone needs to dig back into the 
details to figure out what a commit touched).

There was already an outline for building the release notes into at 
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/8.3release

What I was thinking might be a useful way for multiple people to hack away 
at this problem is to start fleshing out the standard release note 
one-line summaries onto the one page, then delete the relevant commits 
from the other.  When the changelog page is empty, then everything is 
documented.

I didn't actually start doing this though as I didn't want to dump any 
more time into a process that may not actually be used.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: PGBuildfarm member skylark Branch HEAD Failed at Stage Make