Re: Fixing r-tree semantics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.63.0506240932440.26882@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Fixing r-tree semantics  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> both directions (X and Y) for 1-D inquiries.  The same problems exist in
> the contrib/rtree_gist implementation, because it just copied the r-tree
> logic without inquiring too closely into it :-(

you're right, it was the beginning of our GiST experiments. Later we were
interested in split algorithm and we never actually used rtree because we
have used pg_sphere for working with spherical data. Glad to see
you fixed these longstanding problem ! Does it means we could expect
rtree_gist opclasses moved to core ?

    Regards,        Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity