Re: win32 performance - fsync question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Evgeny Rodichev
Subject Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.62.0502172155210.21926@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: win32 performance - fsync question  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: win32 performance - fsync question  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
There are two different concerns here.

1. transactions loss because of unexpected power loss and/or system failure
2. inconsistent database state

For many application (1) is fairly acceptable, and (2) is not.

So I'd like to formulate my questions by another way.

- if PostgeSQL is running without fsync, and power loss occur, which kind
of damage is possible? 1, 2, or both?

- it looks like with proper fwrite/fflush policy it is possible to
guarantee that only transactions loss may occur, but database
keeps some consistent state as before (several) last transactions.
Is it true for PostgeSQL?

Regards,
E.R.
________________________________________________________________________e
Evgeny Rodichev                          Sternberg Astronomical Institute
email: er@sai.msu.su                              Moscow State University
Phone: 007 (095) 939 2383
Fax:   007 (095) 932 8841                       http://www.sai.msu.su/~er


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: win32 performance - fsync question