Re: Weird locking situation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: Weird locking situation
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.58.0310031846580.6355@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird locking situation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > OK, I tried it again and it still seems buggy to me...
>
> > I wonder if it's something to do with the tsearch trigger on food_foods?
>
> I tried a table with a simple BEFORE trigger and it didn't fail.
> But when I added a GIST index, it did:
>
> [ install contrib/btree_gist ]
> regression=# create index gindex on foo using gist (f2);
> CREATE INDEX
> ...
> regression=# UPDATE foo SET f2=now() WHERE f1=1;
> ERROR:  deadlock detected
> DETAIL:  Process 18122 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 154635 of database 17139; blocked by process 18133.
> Process 18133 waits for ShareLock on transaction 6330; blocked by process 18122.
>
> The trouble here is that GIST indexes are not concurrency-safe.
> This is on the TODO list but I fear it's not a small task ...

You're right. We hoped to work on concurrency this year and already
did some research. But life is so complicated :(

>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
Regards,    Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] HeapTuple->t_tableOid==0 after SPI_exec