Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rich Teer
Subject Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded?
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.21.0005291933560.24272-100000@zen.rite-group.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded?  (Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Joseph Shraibman wrote:

> > Postgresql works under a multi-process model, it will take advantage
> > of multiple processors.  However it not multi-threaded.
> >
> So in other words, it *is* multithreaded.  It just uses heavyweight
> threads.

Thanks - but I did mean (light weight) threads, as opposed to processes.
I think the former can be more efficient than the latter - although perhaps
a bit more tricky to design well!

--
Rich Teer

NT tries to do almost everything UNIX does, but fails - miserably.

The use of Windoze cripples the mind; its use should, therefore, be
regarded as a criminal offence.  (With apologies to Edsger W. Dijkstra)

If it ain't analogue, it ain't music.

Voice: +1 (250) 763-6205
WWW: www.rite-group.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Chmara
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql usage clip.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded?