Re: Precision of calculated numeric fields - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Travis Bauer
Subject Re: Precision of calculated numeric fields
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.10.10006061258020.24392-100000@blindcat.cs.indiana.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Precision of calculated numeric fields  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Precision of calculated numeric fields
List pgsql-general
Is this the mod field of the Field class in JDBC2? Does -1 alway mean, for
numeric types, that the precision is undefined?  If so, I could patch up
the ResultSet class to function properly.  I traced through the
ResultSet code this morning.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
----------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

>
> Sounds like the jdbc driver also gets confused when it sees typmod -1
> for a numeric field.
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum Question
Next
From: Ed Loehr
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum Question