On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Christian Schröder wrote:
> 1. Implement it as you suggested.
> The only disadvantage of this approach is that the
> AbstractJdbc2DatabaseMetaData would have to contain also the jdbc3
> code. I personally would not expect to find the jdbc3
> implementation in the jdbc2 class, but if that's ok to you I won't
> complain about it.
I think this is the way to go. It avoids all the confusion of duplication
or splitting it into a half-dozen functions. It's OK for a base class to
implement more functionality than it needs to make life easier for its
children.
Kris Jurka
