On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Miroslav Šulc wrote:
> Thank you for explanation. If I still want to write inet[] data, is it
> sufficient to implement PGobject so it returns 'inet[]' type and '{ "ip",
> "ip" }' value and pass that to setObject()?
That should work although you'll probably need to write _inet
instead of inet[]. The underscore variant is the the backend's true
datatype name and I'm not sure if it will accept the other version in this
context.
