Re: in memory views - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kris Jurka
Subject Re: in memory views
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.63.0605101715020.26920@leary2.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: in memory views  (Thomas Vatter <thomas.vatter@network-inventory.de>)
Responses Re: in memory views
List pgsql-performance

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Thomas Vatter wrote:

> Yes, the difference between psql command line and application is 6
> seconds to 40 seconds. It is exactly the step resultSet =
> excecuteQuery() that needs 40 seconds. I use next() as a cursor through
> the resultSet, but I fear this is not enough, do I have to use
> createStatement(resultSetType, resultSetConcurrency) respectively
> prepareStatement (resultSetType, resultSetConcurrency) to achieve the
> cursor behaviour?

http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/81/query.html#query-with-cursor

Kris Jurka


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Lot'sa joins - performance tip-up, please?
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: UNSUBSCRIBE