Re: SET within a function? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Edmund Dengler
Subject Re: SET within a function?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.58.0310141247380.12650@cyclops4.esentire.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET within a function?  ("Arthur Ward" <award@dominionsciences.com>)
Responses Re: SET within a function?
List pgsql-general
The problem I would face is that this still needs to be a sequential scan
in the table rather than an index lookup.

Regards,
Ed

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Arthur Ward wrote:

> > Is the rewrite only for the literal 'X = NULL' or will it do a test
> > against a value such as 'X = OLD.X' (and rewrite is OLD.X is NULL)?
> >
> > Is there any way to match NULLS to each other (as I am looking for a
> > literal row, not using NULL as the UNKNOWN). I suppose I could put in a
> > dummy value for the 'Not a valid value', but it seems to be quite awkward
> > when I really do want the NULL.
>
> I ended up writing an "equivalent" function for the project I'm working
> on. It goes like this in plpgsql:
>
>     IF $1 IS NULL THEN
>         RETURN $2 IS NULL;
>     ELSIF $2 IS NULL THEN
>         -- We already know $1 is not null.
>         RETURN FALSE;
>     ELSE
>         -- Both args are not null.
>         RETURN $1 = $2;
>     END IF;
>
> That's the basic idea. I put a wrapper around this to generate a copy of
> it for all the data types used in my database.
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Arthur Ward"
Date:
Subject: Re: SET within a function?
Next
From: "pw"
Date:
Subject: converting varchar date strings to date