On Wed, 25 May 2005, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 25-05-2005 alle 13:25 -0500, Kris Jurka ha scritto:
> [...]
> > ident_start [A-Za-z\200-\377_]
> > ident_cont [A-Za-z\200-\377_0-9\$]
> > identifier {ident_start}{ident_cont}*
> >
> > So \200-\377 is octal for any character with the high bit set. The list
> > of what characters this could map to numbers in the tens of thousands for
> > unicode, so it's not really feasibly to return in this method.
>
> if I understand correclty, the valid charset is the one computed by the
> attached class. It seems to me that this is 191 characters long.
> Could you please let me know where I am wrong?
You are assuming that each character is only one byte. The backend lexing
rules are a byte by byte operation, but the JDBC side is returning a
String of characters. Consider the character "Latin Small Letter s with
Acute" (\u015B) gets encoded in UTF-8 as C5 9B or \305\233 in octal. This
is one character in the result of getExtraNameCharacters.
Kris Jurka
