On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> Well, actually there is almost no implementation at all. Parsing strings in
> Java in 2005 is a royal pain in the ass - doing that for 0.x% users suck even
> more.
Well, just be thankful the 8.0 release finally dropped JDK 1.1 support.
> Let's assume I'd write a JDBC2 version with old-school string parsing - would
> you apply it to upstream, or are there any other show stoppers?
>
We definitely want something better for PGInterval. I do have some
questions about the implementation you've got.
1) You have an "int milliseconds" field. PG supports microsecond
precision in intervals. Is there any reason not to go with a plain "float
seconds" field instead of splitting these up?
2) getValue() calls nf.format(Math.abs(milliseconds)), if milliseconds is
2 won't the NumberFormat(ter) turn that into .02 ?
3) In general the whole "before" API is confusing. Do you have any better
ideas on how to handle this?
a) Note getValue() returns the wrong value if hours == 0 and minutes < 0.
b) Doesn't clone() need to copy the before setting?
c) After a setValue() if someone does setYear() don't they need to
know the before setting (which is protected).
Kris Jurka
