On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Kris
> > I'm not clear what your advocating in concrete terms. A new pseudo type
> > "binary data" that could be used until it needs to convert it into a
> > concrete type? When does this conversion have to happen?
> >
> Couldn't this be limited to the client/server protocol? There are 4
> cases that will fail today. If you attempt to:
>
> 1. stream lob data from the client for storage in a bytea.
> 2. send a bytea data "by value" for storage in a LOB.
> 3. read LOB data that is passed as a bytea.
> 4. read bytea data that is really a LOB.
>
> As you pointed out earlier, it should be possible to make the client
> handle cases #3 and #4 so what's left for the server is to deal with #1
> and #2. That doesn't sound like rocket science to me.
>
Well you've summarized the problem, but you certainly haven't given any
concrete suggestions on how this could actually be done. I'm not sure
this even qualifies as handwaving.
Kris Jurka
