Re: FW: Question about the postgres resultset implementation - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Kris Jurka
Subject Re: FW: Question about the postgres resultset implementation
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.56.0410131600250.2777@leary.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to FW: Question about the postgres resultset implementation  ("Tornroth, Phill" <ptornroth@intellidot.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Kris Jurka wrote:

> I believe Peter's suggestion was to use a hashmap to cache the
> string->index mapping so that findColumn would only need to do the
> equalsIgnoreCase on the first call of that string, meaning once per column
> instead of for every call.
>

I've committed a fix to cvs following this suggestion.  The new findColumn
method looks like this:

Kris Jurka

public int findColumn(String columnName) throws SQLException
{
        Integer index = (Integer)columnNameIndexMap.get(columnName);
        if (index != null) {
                return index.intValue();
        }

        final int flen = fields.length;
        for (int i = 0 ; i < flen; ++i) {
                if (fields[i].getColumnLabel().equalsIgnoreCase(columnName)) {
                        index = new Integer(i+1);
                        columnNameIndexMap.put(columnName, index);
                        return index.intValue();
                }
        }

        throw new PSQLException (GT.tr("The column name '{0}' was not found in this ResultSet.", columnName));
}


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: A solution to the SSL customizing problem
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: Question about the postgres resultset implementation