On Wed, 19 May 2004, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Instead, how about something like:
>
> - For named statements, plan at Parse time always.
> - For unnamed statements, plan at Bind time always.
>
> The assumption here is that if the client is using the unnamed
> statement, it's unlikely that it will be repeatedly reusing that
> statement with different parameter values so there is little benefit to
> preserving the query plan at the cost of being unable to plan for
> specific parameter values. If the client is using named statements,
> there's no change in behaviour from the current approach, so presumably
> the client knows what it's doing! :)
I was under the impression that the query protocol would Parse once and
then Bind/Execute for each execution of a statement. If that's true we
can't use the unnamed portal because it can be destroyed if a
multithreaded app is using two Statements simultaneously. The lock on
pgstream will be given up between executions of a statement.
Kris Jurka
