Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.44.0301131040170.39187-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:reedstrm@rice.edu]
> > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
> > To: Vince Vielhaber
> > Cc: Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
> >
> >
> > And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?)
> > indicating that the bandwidth was down in the noise for them
> > (as an ISP).
>
> I think that was Vince talking about 1 mirror. The January stats to date
> (bear in mind it didn't go live until the 4/5th Jan), for the Portal and
> idocs *only* (ie, not including gborg, techdocs, developer, user-lounge,
> archives, fts, pgadmin, odbc, jdbc or ftp) are:
>
> Total Hits 1339547
> Total Files 1064536
> Total Pages 324346
> Total Visits 58178
> Total KBytes 2712883
>
> In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
>
> I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)

It's irrelevant.  The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored and the
question was about mirrors.

Vince.
-- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond!  http://www.pop4.net/  http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com       Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?