Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8856E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev@michvhf.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > Total Hits 1339547
> > Total Files 1064536
> > Total Pages 324346
> > Total Visits 58178
> > Total KBytes 2712883
> >
> > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
> >
> > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
>
> It's irrelevant.  The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored
> and the question was about mirrors.

It's not irrelevant. The original question was a complaint about the ads
and why we have them - this shows the amount of traffic we get for a
small portion of the site which can give some idea how busy other bits
of the sites might get.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Next
From: Joerg Hessdoerfer
Date:
Subject: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?